Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MENS
|This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.|
This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the page entitled MENS.
This page is kept as an historic record.
The result of the debate was to keep the article.
From Cleanup: MENS - no content (imported from Cleanup by SimonP)
- Google turns up 379 results. This seems to be an ad. Delete. Johnleemk 02:16, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
- Hidden among the hype are some facts. I have expanded the stub. MENS is widely used and researched, but recent and probably controversial. Although related, it is in fact different from TENS. Keep Thesteve 09:33, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Yep, looks good now. Well done, keepworthy. DS 00:40, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue or the deletion should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.